Assaying ORMUS
by Barry Carter
Created:
Modified:
David Hudson claimed
that the evidence that his product is a superconductor was that the purified
and super annealed form of it would levitate away from his hands when he
brought them near the powder. He stated that only the S-ORME gold and iridium
would do this.
This phenomenon sounds more like electrostatic repulsion, which happens to
ordinary non-superconductive materials, than diamagnetic levitation which
happens to superconductors.
Regardless of whether this is indicative of electrostatic repulsion or
superconductivity, the difficulty, secrecy and expense of the annealing process
that
Hudson also claimed (in some of his lectures) that he could put energy into
these materials through induction but that they were not superconductors in the
ordinary sense of the term; i.e. they would not conduct current when placed
between two electrodes. To my knowledge,
Before either of us had heard of David Hudson my friend Jim described his
experiences with "fly ash" which exhibited electrostatic levitation
properties quite similar to the S-ORME materials that
Thus these reported observations of David Hudson and Jim may or may not be
indicators of superconductivity.
The magnetic levitation video that I made of some of Jim's ORMUS gold
levitating away from a magnetic field is much more consistent with the magnetic
levitation effect of a superconductor but no one else has replicated this.
David Hudson also claimed in his patent that Cooper pairing (presumed to be a
prerequisite for superconductivity) was responsible for the spectroscopic
invisibility of the ORME elements. In his patent you can find the following
passage describing this effect:
"Attempting
to quantify the number of electrons remaining in an ORME is extremely difficult
due to the electrons lost to oxidation, thermal treatment, and the inability,
except from theory, to quantify electron pairs using electron quanta. It
is established, however, that the ORME does not have valence electrons
available for standard spectroscopic analysis such as atomic absorption,
emission spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy.
Moreover, x-ray fluorescence or x-ray diffraction spectrometry will not respond
the same as they do with T-metals in standard analysis. The existence of
an ORME, while not directly identifiable by the aforesaid standard analyses,
can be characterized by infrared (IR) spectra by a doublet which represents the
bonding energy of the electron pairs within the ORME."
This property, which
Two or three ORMUS researchers have reported that the ocean water precipitate
has a major component which is spectroscopically
invisible (30-40%). This identification method basically takes a sample and
divides it into two equal parts. One part is dried and weighed and the other
part is sent for quantitative spectroscopic assay. After accounting for cations and anions the difference is the spectroscopically invisible portion.
One can also compare the spectrographic signature of known ORMUS gold and sea
water like August did in the reports at:
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/XRFM3Sea.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/xrfongold.htm
Spectroscopic invisibility, while it is probably an indicator of superconductor
related properties, may not correlate well with other superconductor properties
like magnetic levitation for a variety of possible reasons. I mentioned earlier
that
Also, Jim noticed and described a phenomenon which might skew some superconductive
behaviors. Jim claimed that the ORMUS elements like to "hide out" in
tight spaces. We speculate that this behavior happens because the ORMUS
elements have the Meissner effect which causes them to retreat from
electromagnetic fields. I imagine that this behavior would cause these elements
to "hide out" inside molecules of other elements which might provide
some shielding from electromagnetic fields. This might mean that the ORMUS in
sea water, the ORMUS in the air and the ORMUS in rock source materials would
not exhibit much response to electromagnetic fields and would, in effect, be
camouflaged by the molecules it is hiding within. Remember that
In summary, it is important to specify which properties associated with
superconductivity you are talking about and why we suspect that these
properties might be associated with the naturally occurring form of the ORMUS
materials.
For more info on this subject see the following links:
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/what.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/superconductivity.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/boson.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/superfluid.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/shielding.htm