Better
by Barry Carter
Created
People
often claim that:
More is better
Purer is better
Stronger is better
These things may be true in some cases but:
You are unique, just like everyone else.
What is best for you will not be the same for everyone else.
Each of us has different nutritional needs and these needs change over time.
What is best for you right now probably will not be what is best for you next
year.
More isn't always better.
One of the most toxic minerals - arsenic - has recently been found to be an
essential mineral nutrient at very low levels:
http://www.eagle-min.com/faq/faq94.htm
Magnesium, which is an essential mineral nutrient, also has a level at which it
is toxic. Here is a quote on this from:
http://www.webmd.com/vitamins-and-supplements/lifestyle-guide-11/supplement-guide-magnesium
"But excessive use of magnesium supplements can be toxic."
Purer isn't always better.
The nutrient or toxin status of some elements also seems to be related to their
ratio in combination with other elements. For example, sodium is a toxic metal
and chlorine is a toxic gas yet when they are combined you get salt, which is
an essential nutrient.
Pure vitamin C can cause you to bruise easily if you don't get enough bioflavenoids with it.
I would guess that all of the ORMUS elements work better in balance with other
ORMUS elements and other non ORMUS nutrients.
Purity obviously means different things to different people.
If ORMUS is
a gas, as Dr. John Milewski has postulated, then we cannot see it. If we cannot
see it, then what do we see in the white precipitate of various elements?
Some
scientists and ORMUS experts have proposed that we are actually seeing the
chemical "box" that the ORMUS is in:
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/box.htm
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/clathrate.htm
This
hypothesis raises the questions:
Can the
same ORMUS elements hide out in different chemical boxes (clathrate cages)?
If the same
ORMUS elements are in different chemical boxes will they assay as the box
rather than as the ORMUS element?
Do the same
ORMUS elements have different biological effects if they are in different
chemical boxes?
David
Hudson claimed that one ORMUS element assayed as iron, silica or aluminum
depending on what stage of conversion from metal to ORMUS it was in. Is this an
example of ORMUS moving from one chemical box to another in the process of
conversion into a white powder?
Which stage
of conversion is purest?
If the
ORMUS minerals are essential nutrients, as we suspect, then they are probably
like other essential nutrients in that they work best with other essential
nutrients. This suggest some questions:
Are the
benefits of ORMUS gold greater when you ingest it alone or when you ingest it
with ORMUS rhodium and ORMUS iridium?
Are the
benefits of the main ORMUS elements greater when you ingest them alone or when
you ingest them with other nutrients?
If the
ORMUS nutrients are best when used in a balanced diet with other vitamins and
minerals then greater purity might be a detriment.
Stronger
isn't always better.
When using an ORMUS product it is not always beneficial to use the most
powerful available. Part of the healing process involves something called the
"healing crisis". This is often an unpleasant condition wherein many
of the symptoms of a past illness will re-manifest for a period of time.
Sometimes these symptoms might be more unpleasant than the original illness
because they are concentrated in a short period of time. You can read more
examples of unpleasant results from using stronger ORMUS products at:
http://subtleenergies.xyz/ormus/tw/realthing.htm
Recent discussion about how alchemical processes may make more, purer or
stronger substances which provide unspecified and undocumented benefits
triggered this post.