ORMUS and Ping Pong
Peter Mann
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:13:36 +1000
From: Peter Mann
Subject: ORMUS in Aetheric Matter ?
It is my opinion that the subtle bodies (ranging through aetheric,
emotional, mental, spiritual, soul and crystalline) are comprised of
progressively less dense matter in that sequence.
Considering the reported association of ORMUS with superconductivity,
ORMUS elements may have the necessary attribute to explain (for
example) the dazzling speed and exquisite precision of the world-class
table tennis player. With neurons having a bioelectric
transmission velocity of approx 6 feet per second, no way can the
biochemical central nervous system form the basis of calculating
trajectories and controlling response at that level. As an
engineer with experience in the specialty of closed-loop control
(courtesy of the Moog Corporation) I can state with complete certainty
that the CNS [central nervous system] is short of the bandwidth
required for that sort of activity by at least 4 orders of magnitude.
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:56:56 +1100
From: Peter Mann
Subject: ORMUS in Aetheric Matter
Hi Barry,
I worked as a Project Engineer with Moog Australia for 4 years, between
1988 and 1992. That time with Moog was (so far) the highlight of
my engineering career.
William Moog invented the first electrohydraulic servovalves in the
early 1950s, and it was the outstanding stiffness, linearity, speed and
precision of the servovalve that enabled Moog to become the leading
company in closed-loop control systems. It was Moog's servovalves
that finally gave adequate control of the thrust vector for the first
successful American launches of large liquid-fuelled rockets (up until
then they'd had a lack of stability that caused them to go off course
and crash, even though the USA had "acquired" most of Hitler's V2
rocket scientists).
Moog servovalves and hydraulic actuators still control the thrust
vector on the Space Shuttles (i.e. they position the angle of the
rocket motors, which are gimbal-mounted), as well as positioning the
flight control surfaces of exotic (and aerodynamically highly unstable)
aircraft such as the B2 stealth Bomber. The B2 is flyable only
because the onboard computer corrects the tendency to tumble away from
the joystick setpoint hundreds of times a second (modern combat
aircraft are made more agile by designing them to be intrinsically
unstable, and then using fly-by-wire closed loop control to impose a
facsimile of stability, so the aircraft is electronically nagged into
doing only what the pilot asks for).
My experience was in industrial applications for Moog's astoundingly
fast and accurate equipment, and while working for Moog I learned
closed loop control design practices quite unlike the bizarre
mathematical modeling that I wrestled with in my undergraduate Control
Systems subjects.
One of the rules of thumb that we designed from is that the controlling
element (in that case, the servovalve) had to be at least 3 times
faster than the frequency of force-modulation that could be imposed on
a structure (i.e. must have a useable response frequency 3 times the
physical resonant frequency of the physical structure that was being
dynamically controlled). Usually we did positioning systems, as
was pioneered with the rocket motors, but some applications we
controlled with feedback on force or velocity.
If the valve was less than 3 times faster, the lag between feedback and
the application of force could go so far out of phase that the machine
would be intrinsically unstable, and instead of going to position
setpoint, it could only oscillate around the required position.
So this is where one part of the concept came from.
While I was at school, I studied Biology (had a talent for it), and I
remember that back then (1967), the transmission rate of an electrical
impulse along the axon of a nerve had already been measured as 4 to 6
feet per second, depending on the species whose nerve had been
vivisected.
So far as I know, I am the first person to put these two facts together
so as to logically establish that no way can the electrochemical
transmission of nerve impulses provide the control loop for the feats
of dexterity that are commonplace in sport, and that therefore we have
compelling evidence that there is an "as-yet-unrecognised" physical
feedback/control system with a bandwidth orders of magnitude faster
than the CNS. To illustrate that with the most persuasive
example, I chose table-tennis because the interplay between the top
players is so blindingly fast that I personally cannot visually follow
the action with unbroken perception . . . and I was a professional
driver with a specialization in high-speed driving, so my visual skills
are quite exceptional.
It sounds straightforward enough, but although I have been putting this
idea about since year 2000, you are the first person to pick up on the
significance of this. And I thank you for that.
Recognition, at last!
Best Regards,
Peter Mann