1. Which one?
The first question we
should ask ourselves is:
Should it be a Vortex trap or a T-type one?
The answer we should
give is: “But a T-type of course!”
And here is why:
a. T-type
watertraps are easier and cheaper to
construct and
it’s also easier to find the proper materials.
b.
The vortex trap loses
easily its efficiency if the central hole is not perfectly centred.
c.
T-type watertraps are
easier to add stages to (and make them stronger and stronger).
d.
The T-type Watertrap is
purely a magnetic trap, but the Vortex works in a double way. It is
mainly a
centrifugal trap and secondly a magnetic trap.
The
thought behind the centrifugal principle was to
take advantage of the antigravity phenomenon that sometimes takes place
on
ORME.
Unfortunately
this few years of experience with Ormus
have shown that this phenomenon doesn’t happen very easily.
Most of the times even if Ormus
loses some of its weight, it’s still very heavy. Don’t
forget that we have to compare with the molecule weight of water
(16+2=18).
This is very light! If we consider that we deal with the atomic weight
of
Ormus-metals (197.2 for example for Gold – not to mention the
possibility of
Ormus being diatomic-2x197.2 or triatomic-3x197.2 etc
).
How much of its normal weight should it lose so that the centrifugal
coefficient of the trap will be positive? Instead of collecting them it
could
even drive them away!
Things
are even worse when we work with seawater.
Since seawater is not chemically neutral, many of the Ormus may be
bonded to
heavier molecules.
2.
Which
are the rules for constructing a strong
T-type WaterTrap?
a.
The
first rule is the most simple one:
Prefer Neodymium magnets to Ceramic ones.
They are more
expensive but they
are much stronger. If you can’t find them or can’t buy them don’t get
disappointed. You can come to the same quality of water but with a
slower flow.
b.
The second
rule is the most difficult to explain:
Follow
the correct architecture.
What does this
mean?
Well, you simply put a donut magnet
on your T connection and now you have two outputs: The “waste water
output” and the “selection water output”.
Obviously the
“waste water” must come from the side
were the magnet is.
Correct.
But now you have
three possibilities. All three work
but only one of them works efficiently.
Unfortunately you
can find all three on the Internet as
suggestions for trap constructions.
But which is the
correct one?
The Golden
Mirror
We shouldn’t let
theory steal our time, but I will only say two things very briefly:
Every conductor has
these three characteristic properties that we all know from school: R,
L and C*. L is the “coil like” property and it’s easy to remember that
when a coil reacts to an induced magnetic field (H) its reaction (-H)
is on the same axis with the first field.
The main difference
with Ormus is that R=0. We deal with a superconductor. This means that
the loop currents that create the reacting field don’t fall instantly
to zero and “H” is steadily reflected on the Ormus mirror producing a
Force (F) that repels Ormus away.
Fig. 2
Field and Force Geometry
·
In
years to come we expect to find more about the “C” property of Ormus
but we don’t expect it to be as useful as “L” is (how many
electrostatic speakers do you Know?).
Having understood the above we
conclude that from the three possibilities, “A” (from Fig.1) is the
correct one. (It’s
the only one where the magnet pushes Ormus directly to the selection
output).